AI as Your Thinking Partner: How to Ask Better Questions in a World Full of Answers

2025-12-29

We’ve been living with an abundance of information ever since the internet was invented, so having more content than we can process isn’t anything new. What is new, however, in this age of AI, is not merely the increased speed at which information can be accessed, but the degree to which this information can now be tailored to the user. With natural-language queries, LLM’s can interpret intent, apply reasoning across their knowledge base, and generate responses that are shaped by the user’s specific input. This shift matters. Natural-language searching is powerful, but only if we know how to ask the right questions. 

The foundation of any meaningful interaction with an LLM is having a clearly defined goal before asking anything at all. Effective prompting begins with understanding what you are trying to accomplish. Since quality of output is reliant on the clarity of the input, it is essential to set precise goals and articulate what needs to be achieved. However, this does not mean you must fully understand the task from the start. In many cases, GenAI can help you break down a problem, suggest possible approaches, or generate ideas that guide you toward your objective. What matters is beginning with a point of clarity, even if that clarity is simply acknowledging what you don’t know yet.

Naturally, the complexity of a task determines how much precision a prompt needs in order to be effective. Simple tasks can be handled with straightforward prompts, while more advanced tasks may require structured techniques. Using the latter for a simple task is not inherently wrong, but it can be unnecessarily time-consuming and deliver minimal additional value.This makes it essential not only to craft an effective prompt, but also to choose the right prompting approach for the specific task. Developing this judgment is part of becoming a more intentional and efficient user of AI tools.

Effective prompting is not just about what you ask, but about how you approach your interaction with a GenAI tool. It is important to keep in mind that AI is a tool, not a black box. Mistakes are possible, and still common, so evaluating every output is crucial so that you can then guide the LLM to the right direction. In particular, complex tasks demand structure and careful guidance, but even then, iteration is essential. The first response is rarely the best, so use follow up prompts to strengthen the model’s understanding of your tasks and goal.

Some practical tips for effective prompt engineering include:

  • Assign the model a role, such as “tutor” or “strategist,” to tailor the perspective of its output.
  • Provide examples to guide style, structure, or tone.
  • Specify the desired output format, like bullet points, tables, or summaries.
  • Ask the model to break down its reasoning step by step for clarity.
  • Request multiple options or variations to encourage creativity.
  • Encourage the AI to review its own responses and check for errors or gaps.

Applying these tips and tricks can help expedite the process of interacting with AI tools and yielding better results that align to your personal needs. Prompt engineering is still relatively new, and experimenting with different techniques can be both useful and fun! For example there are debates around whether phrasing prompts more aggressively versus more politely affects results is better, which highlights that we don’t yet fully understand how AI internally processes prompts. 

In any case, the real skill for Gen Z isn’t just being naturally tech-savvy, but knowing how to maximize efficiency in their interactions with AI tools. This includes both framing clear, focused prompts but also viewing prompting as a collaborative process in which you provide constructive feedback so that the model can refine and improve its output. 

© 2024 Pcss. All rights reserved.

Logo Co-funded by the European Union

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.